November 4, 2021

View PDF of document

"Summary"

---

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT

1. Declares, by a majority, the complaints concerning Articles 5 and 8 inadmissible and the remainder of the application admissible;
2. Holds, by six votes to one, that there has been a violation of Article 2 of the Convention in respect of its procedural as well as its substantive limb;
   
3. Holds, by six votes to one, that there has been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention in respect of Karen Petrosyan;
4. Holds, by six votes to one, that there has been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention in respect of the applicant;